|
About This Step
The following activities will guide you in
the completion of NASA’s product review process. These
activities include project evaluation, partnerships, and federal requirements and regulations. The
outcomes of these activities are not your required deliverables
for the Virtual Design Center, but you may ask your facilitator
for guidance in the completion of these activities.
Activity 1: Evaluations, Dissemination, and Partnerships
Even with a well-developed design document, it is still very
important that you plan how you will implement, evaluate, and
improve your design. All NASA-funded educational materials must
go through a comprehensive external review process before
publication. Designers should review the material in house
before submitting it to NASA for the formal review process:
In-house/Internal Comprehensive Review
-
Review your curricular materials as the product is being
developed and when complete before sending to the formal
NASA external comprehensive review process.
-
The internal comprehensive review process involves
evaluation of the quality of the product and adherence to
NASA regulations.
-
Use the
NASA Exemplary Criteria Checklist as a guide for adherence to NASA
quality standards and some of the NASA regulations.
-
Read NASA Federal Regulations to make sure that your product conforms
to regulations, such as Children’s Online Privacy
Protection Act (COPPA).
-
Print materials must go through internal
communications materials review. Read the article,
NASA Communications Material
Review Process. Use the guide,
An Interim Guide for Producing Printed Communications
Material.
External Comprehensive Review
-
Submit material to the communications material review
process using the link
http://65.168.55.83/portal/site/osc.
-
Submit material to the NASA Office of Education
formal review cycle. There are two formal review cycles per
year.
In addition to the NASA criteria, the National Science
Foundation has a publication that would help you plan your
project evaluation:
The 2002 User-friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation
If your design is more focused on development of a learning
technology, the following tools will help you in planning your
evaluation:
Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation (Download Tools)
-
How will you disseminate your project?
-
How will you evaluate your project using valid
evaluation methods?
-
What models and techniques will you use?
-
How will you incorporate the results into the
design?
-
In addition to your partnerships established for
the design and testing, how will you establish your
distribution, implementation, and/or funding partnerships?
-
What are your plans for sustaining your project
implementations and updating contents?
It is good to decide early on whom you would like to partner
with for your project and get them involved in the brainstorming
and planning.
Activity 2: Technical Requirements and Other Federal Regulations
Technical Requirements
One of the essential activities for NASA designers is to help
teachers and learners discover new learning technologies that
can support inquiry-based learning. A consideration for
introducing new learning technologies is providing a clear
understanding of the technical requirements as well as training
on the use of the technology. Software should be tested on
various operating systems, such as MAC versus PC, Windows 2000
and 98. Using testbed classrooms can provide great insight
as to the district’s technological literacy and capacity and
should be considered in conjunction with the learning
technologies.
Designers may also incorporate new learning technologies that
focus on special needs audiences. The intention of federal
regulation 508 is to provide disabled people with new learning
opportunities and to foster the development of technologies that
will support a learning environment. The
National Center for
Technology Innovation,
funded by the U.S. Office of Special Education Programs,
advances learning opportunities for individuals with
disabilities by fostering technology innovation. A tech matrix
is available on the center's web site. It lists current assistive
technologies and support requirements for using them.
Activity: Complete a thorough inventory of your testbed
district’s current technology, including operating systems,
available software, and 508 compliances. List the district’s
current use of learning technologies, such as 3-D animations,
simulations, online instruction, and assistive technologies.
Then create a comprehensive inventory of new learning
technologies that will be introduced into the curriculum as
well as any new hardware and software requirements
needed.
Federal Regulations
Four key federal regulations that designers must comply with
are 1) COPPA 2) 508-c compliance 3) metatagging, and 4)
distribution of e-products. Read the NASA Federal Regulations
article for a comprehensive overview of NASA required compliance
issues. Any designer that collects information on an
educational web site from children ages 13 or younger must comply
with COPPA regulations. Section 508 requires that federal
agencies’ electronic and information technology is accessible to
people with disabilities. For the latest information on 508
compliance issues, visit the NASA
web site.
Metatagging is the process of embedding labels or tags about
the content within the content to theoretically improve and
refine the relevance and precision of a search. The term
e-product describes developed curricular or educational material
that can be accessed over the Internet and includes educational
web sites, Adobe Acrobat PDF files, Flash animations, and movie
files. Refer to the NASA Federal Regulations article for
complying with NASA regulations for disseminating e-products.
Activity: Review your designed curricular product and create
a checklist for compliance with each of the four main federal
regulations: COPPA, 508-c, metatagging, and distribution of
e-products.
DEBRIEFING
Review all Virtual Design Center deliverables you created to identify ways to
improve and enhance your design. Whether you are designing an
educational product for NASA and other federal agencies or
looking for funding from one of them, you have solid
documentation to move forward with your development or to
incorporate into a good proposal. If you would like to get
feedback from your facilitator, submit your plan for
dissemination, evaluation, and partnerships. Good luck with your
design project and keep us posted on your progress!
Sincerely,
The Virtual Design Center Team |